How large are individual income tax incentives for charitable giving?
The individual income tax deduction for charitable giving provides a substantial incentive to give by reducing the economic cost of making a donation. In 2018, charitable giving by individuals is estimated to reach $299 billion at an annual revenue loss of around $44 billion.
Charitable Giving by Itemizers and Nonitemizers
An income tax deduction for charitable giving is available only to taxpayers who itemize their deductions. Estimates from the Urban-Brookings Tax Policy Center (TPC) suggest that for 2018, charitable giving by individuals could reach $299 billion. TPC estimates that the 90 percent of households that do not itemize their deductions will contribute about 40 percent of total charitable giving, while the 10 percent of households who itemize will provide about 60 percent (table 1).
Giving by Income Group
Charitable giving patterns differ by income. The charitable deduction provides higher-income taxpayers with a larger tax subsidy per dollar donated, because such taxpayers are more likely to itemize deductions and because they generally face higher tax rates. Some research indicates that higher-income taxpayers are more responsive or sensitive to each dollar of tax subsidy—that is, each dollar of government cost generates more charitable contributions—perhaps because a subsidy is more salient to those more likely to use tax advisers and give more to charity even in absence of a tax incentive.
Tax proposals that affect incentives for higher-income individuals to give, however, will have a disproportionate effect on the charities to which these individuals are more likely to donate, such as higher education and museums.
Table 2 shows the amount of charitable contributions for taxpayers claiming an itemized deduction for those contributions. It does not include giving by nonitemizers. A few things to note: First, most low- and moderate-income taxpayers do not claim a deduction for charitable contributions, largely because most do not itemize. Second, at high-income levels, about 90 percent or more taxpayers claim charitable deductions (before TCJA). And third, the pattern of deductible charitable giving as a percentage of income is U-shaped—average giving is very high for the small percentage of low-income taxpayers who claim a deduction, as well as for the large percentage of very high income taxpayers. The pattern of giving for atypical low-income taxpayers who itemize, however, may not be indicative of giving by all low-income households.
Average Tax Incentive for Giving
The after-tax cost of giving is the value of the gift minus any tax benefits received. If an itemizing taxpayer with a marginal tax rate of 24 percent (that is, the tax rate on the last dollars of income) gives $100 to a local college, for instance, the gift reduces the income tax bill for that person by $24, so the deductible charitable gift has a net cost of only $76. The $24 is the amount of the federal subsidy for giving. If the taxpayer had a 40 percent tax rate, the donation becomes even less costly to the taxpayer, at only $60. In other words, as tax rates increase, the after-tax “price” of charitable giving decreases.
Figure 1 shows a summary of the average after-tax price of charitable giving for taxpayers at different income levels. For the entire population, it is about 85 percent; that is, on average the after-tax federal subsidy is 15 percent. This represents a drop of about 30 percent from the average federal subsidy rate of around 21 percent before the passage of the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act. Note that taxpayers in the top 1 percent have the lowest after-tax price of charitable giving both because they face higher tax rates and because they are more likely to itemize.
Estimated Revenue Loss from the Charitable Deduction
The charitable deduction is estimated to cost approximately $54 billion in 2018 and $240 billion over five years (2017–21) (table 3). The relationship between the revenue loss and the amount of additional giving created by the tax incentive has significant policy implications. For example, if the loss in federal revenue from allowing the charitable deduction is greater than the increase in charitable giving caused by the deduction, then a portion of the federal subsidy is going to donors rather than to the ultimate beneficiaries of charitable gifts. To the extent that Congress views charitable and government efforts as direct substitutes, it might be more efficient to eliminate the deduction and provide charities with direct federal support.
This sometimes leads to proposals, such as allowing a deduction only for giving that exceeds a dollar floor, to concentrate a greater share of the tax incentive on the last rather than first dollars of giving by any taxpayer getting the incentive. Research suggests that first dollars of giving are much less responsive to tax incentives.
Studies on the impact of the tax incentive, however, do not deal with and therefore may underestimate the extent to which the presence of a tax incentive helps create a culture of giving.
Limits on the Charitable Deduction
Congress has placed many limits on the availability of a charitable deduction. Among them are the following:
- The charitable deduction is only available for a subset of qualifying tax-exempt organizations that are charitable in nature, as defined in section 501(c)(3) of the tax code.
- Contributions for individuals are generally allowed up to 60 percent of adjusted gross income, but there is a 30 percent limit for contributions to a foundation and certain other organizations and a 30 percent limit for contributions of capital gain property. Deductible contributions for corporations are limited to 10 percent of corporate income.
- Contributions to many tax-exempt organizations, such as unions and chambers of commerce, are not deductible, though income earned on assets within those organizations is generally excluded from taxation.
Internal Revenue Service. Statistics of Income Tax Stats: Individual Income Tax Returns Publication 1304 (Complete Report). Table 2. ”Individual Income Tax Returns with Itemized Deductions: Sources of Income, Adjustments, Itemized Deductions by Type, Exemptions, and Tax Items,” classified by size of adjusted gross income, tax year 2016.
Joint Committee on Taxation. 2018. “Estimates of Federal Tax Expenditures for Fiscal Years 2017–2021.” JCX-34-18. Washington, DC: Joint Committee on Taxation.
Urban-Brookings Tax Policy Center. “TPC Microsimulation Model, version 0718-1.”
Boris, Elizabeth T., and C. Eugene Steuerle, eds. 2016. Nonprofits and Government: Collaboration and Conflict, 3rd ed. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
McKeever, Brice S., Nathan E. Dietz, and Saunji D. Fyffe. 2016. The Nonprofit Almanac, 9th ed. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
Rosenberg, Joseph, C. Eugene Steuerle, Joycelyn Ovalle, and Philip Stallworth. 2016. “The New Debate over a Charitable Deduction for Nonitemizers.” Washington, DC: Urban Institute.
Stallworth, Philip, Chenxi Lu, and C. Eugene Steuerle. 2016. “Both Clinton and Trump Would Reduce Tax Incentives for Charitable Giving.” TaxVox (blog). November 4.