Skip to main content
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Briefing Book
  • Resources
  • About
  • Contact
  • Support
  • Fiscal Facts
Twitter
Facebook
Logo Site
  • Topics
    • Individual Taxes
    • Business Taxes
    • Federal Budget and Economy
    • State and Local Issues
    • Campaigns, Proposals, and Reforms
  • TaxVox Blog
  • Research & Commentary
  • Laws & Proposals
  • Model Estimates
  • Statistics
  • Features
TaxVox: 
Federal Budget and Economy
RSS

The voices of Tax Policy Center's researchers and staff

Mark J. Mazur
March 19, 2019

Temporary Tax Policy in the U.S.

Last week, I testified before the House  Ways and Means Subcommittee on Select Revenue Measures  on the topic of temporary tax policy. The panel called the hearing to examine those tax provisions for which Congress routinely extends the effective dates--the so-called “extenders” or “expiring provisions”, as well as the numerous provisions in the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act that are scheduled to expire, spring up, or change over the next few years.

Temporary tax policy has a long history in the US. I used the investment tax credit experience of the 1960s through 1980s to illustrate this point.

I also noted two other aspects of temporary tax policy.

When Congress paired extensions of tax breaks with measures to offset the foregone revenue with tax increases, it created a healthy tension. The social value of extending the expiring tax provisions was essentially compared to the economic and political cost of raising someone’s taxes to finance the extension of a tax benefit.   

Another issue concerns timing of congressional action. Retroactively restoring already-expired tax provisions blunts whatever incentive effect the provision may have had. In the extreme case, Congress would be rewarding individuals or businesses with a tax benefit for behavior they undertook in the absence of the incentive-- the very definition of ineffective tax policy.

I suggested three ways Congress could improve tax policy. They are:

  1. Enact fewer temporary tax provisions;
  2. Subject temporary tax provisions to rigorous and objective analysis to determine if they warrant permanent inclusion in the Tax Code; and
  3. Do not retroactively extend tax provisions.

These steps, though modest, would at least be a step in the right direction.

Posts and comments are solely the opinion of the author and not that of the Tax Policy Center, Urban Institute, or Brookings Institution.

Topics

Campaigns, Proposals, and Reforms Budget proposals Federal Budget and Economy Federal budget

Tags

tax extenders
Extenders
temporary tax policy
expiring provisions
House Ways & Means Committee
House Ways and Means Committee
ways and means committee
temporary tax provisions
tax code

Share this page

https://tpc.io/2TKUKVVShare

Andrew Harnik/AP Photo

  • ‹Read Previous Fixing The TCJA: How Should Congress Treat the Alternative Minimum Tax?
  • Read Next› "Let Me Tell You About The Very Rich. They Are Different From You And Me.”
  • Donate Today
  • Topics
  • TaxVox Blog
  • Research & Commentary
  • Laws & Proposals
  • Model Estimates
  • Statistics
  • Privacy Policy
  • Newsletters
Twitter
Facebook
  • © Urban Institute, Brookings Institution, and individual authors, 2022.