The voices of Tax Policy Center's researchers and staff
Earlier this year, Urban Institute researchers contributed to a comprehensive National Academies of Science study examining the fiscal and economic impacts of immigrants and refuting many common misperceptions about immigration.
Immigrants have roughly the same pattern of government spending and funds received as native-born Americans. However, spending on immigrants is somewhat greater primarily because they have more school age children. In part because of these higher education costs, immigrants tend to be more of a burden on state and local government budgets than on federal coffers, though it varies by state.
Although immigrants are costlier to state and local budgets…
A new State and Local Finance Initiative brief examines differences in what taxes are paid and services used by immigrants and native-born people across the 50 states. The brief shows that if state and local government spending is allocated to all people equally, immigrant adults are, on average, $3,000 more expensive per adult (when the costs of children are assigned to their parents). However, it is important to note that much government spending, such as the costs of roads and other public infrastructure, are allocated among the population at-large. If immigrants are not assigned a share of these costs, the gap drops to $450.
However, these patterns vary by state. The maps below show the range of immigrants’ fiscal impacts for an average (they are assigned a share of public goods) and marginal (they are not given a share) cost allocation.
But keep in mind that some states, like West Virginia and Montana, have very small immigrant populations, so these numbers are based on few observations and may be less precise. And the differences across states in taxes paid and services received depends on decisions states make on tax structures and spending levels.
…it’s mostly because they have more children who need education resources.
So why are immigrants costlier for state and local budgets than the native population? Because they tend to have more children than their native-born counterparts (0.52 dependent children versus 0.36 dependent children per adult), who need state and local education resources. We assign the value of this spending to parents.
Education is often the largest portion of state and local annual spending, so whether native or immigrant, adults with children end up being net recipients of state and local spending while adults without children contribute more in taxes than they receive in services.
Investing in children’s education will pay off in the long run. With the aging US population, immigrants and their children are the workforce of tomorrow, contributing not just the labor, but the taxes that will shape our nation’s fiscal health.
With respect to government finances, the National Academies’ report shows that the adult children of immigrants contribute the most on average to federal and state and local coffers. So while public education is expensive to state and local governments, making sure all children—with native and immigrant parents alike—are equipped for tomorrow’s jobs is critical for the country’s future.
This post was originally published on Urban.org and has been lightly edited for TaxVox.
Posts and Comments are solely the opinion of the author and not that of the Tax Policy Center, Urban Institute, or Brookings Institution.
Al Behrman/AP Photo