Tax Stimulus Report Card: Ways and Means Bill
The Tax Policy Center has graded the key tax provisions of the stimulus bill passed by the House of Representatives (the "American Recovery and Reinvestment Tax Act of 2009", as amended). Our grades reflect how well these measures would boost the economy in the short run per dollar of budget cost (sometimes called "bang for the buck"). Details of our analysis are below the report card.
Download complete report card in PDF format
 |
Tax provision | Stimulus effect | Ten-year revenue cost1 | Comments (click on a provision for details) |
| Individual Income Tax Provisions |
| |  | $144.9B | Could start quickly. Payment in small increments may increase stimulus effect but two-year limit and high-income eligibility reduces impact. |
| |  | $4.7B | Highly targeted. Gives cash assistance to low-income families most likely to spend quickly but slow to start. |
| |  | $18.3B | Highly targeted. Gives cash assistance to low-income families most likely to spend quickly but slow to start. |
| |  | $13.7B | Slow to start. Refundable, so it goes to low-income students. Low-income households likely to spend quickly but only when funds become available. Long-term gains if more students attend school. |
| |  | $2.6B | Small short-run stimulus to weak housing market. Large windfall gains to people who would buy anyway. Eliminating repayment simplifies administration. |
| Business Tax Provisions |
| |  | $0.4B | Simplifies tax filing for small businesses and may encourage some businesses to accelerate decisions to invest in capital equipment. Impact is expected to be small and much of tax benefit is likely to go to businesses that would have invested anyway. |
| |  | $5.1B | Previous experience suggests that investment effects would be modest at best. Severity of downturn decreases the stimulus potential. |
| |  | $15.0B | Increases effectiveness of temporary investment incentives such as bonus depreciation and expensing. By increasing cash flow to businesses, it could also stimulate new investment but the effect is likely to be modest. |
| |  | $0.2B | Based on past experience with this wage subsidy, it is unlikely to generate jobs for the target groups. |
| Renewable Energy Tax Provisions |
| |  | $20.0B | Some new investment would be added, but some projects may take time to gear up. |
 |  |  |  |
1Revenue estimates from Joint Committee on Taxation, "Estimated Budget Effects of the Revenue Provisions Contained in Division B, Titles I and III of H.R. 1, as passed by the House of Representatives on January 28, 2009", JCX-14-09, January 30, 2009.
For grading purposes, we assume that each provision will expire as scheduled and consider only the effects on aggregate demand (consumption or investment) or employment in the short-term.
Each grade depends on both timeliness and targeting. To receive an A, a provision would have to begin quickly and go primarily to people who would most likely spend it or to businesses that would most likely use funds to retain workers or expand.
We do not consider the long-term effects on the economy.
An additional web page describes current law, the proposed change, and the short- and long-term effects on the budget, the economy, fairness, and tax complexity. There, we also discuss the likelihood that each proposal would actually expire as scheduled and, for some provisions, explain what changes would raise the grade to an A.
Our report card is preliminary and does not include all of the provisions in the bill – most notably we omit provisions providing about $48 billion of fiscal relief for state and local governments.
We may evaluate additional provisions and adjust our grades and analysis as we learn more about the proposals. In addition, TPC will update its Report Card as the stimulus bill moves through Congress.