|
Press Room Contact Us Urban Institute
Brookings Institution E-mail NewsletterReceive periodic updates on Tax Policy Center publications and events. newsletter archive
|
Running the political numbers Bush campaigned as a 'compassionate conservative' in 2000, but big deficits rankle fiscal conservatives; others question the compassion of his prioritiesAuthor: Judy Keen Published: February 3, 2004 WASHINGTON -- The federal spending plan released Monday by President Bush is making some critics wonder whether he'll campaign this year, as he did in 2000, as a "compassionate conservative." Bush's $ 2.4 trillion budget for fiscal year 2005 may make it harder for him to claim that label. Contrary to conservative doctrine, government spending has grown steadily during his White House tenure, and deficits have replaced surpluses. And to offset big increases in spending on the military and homeland security, Bush has cut dozens of programs that affect Americans' daily lives, including community policing, housing for low-income people and projects to control water pollution. Critics point out:
Growth in overall spending and the forecasts of shortfalls infuriate conservatives who believe that deficits hurt the economy and that spending more than the government brings in is reckless. And that's before some pricey items that Bush won't propose until later. Money for military operations next year in Iraq and Afghanistan, and a plan to let workers invest some of their Social Security withholdings, could drive the deficit higher.
Spending for the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention would drop $ 408 million, or 8.9%. The Environmental Protection Agency's programs would be cut 7.2%. On the other hand, Bush is proposing an extra $ 1 billion for poor school districts and $ 1 billion more for disabled students. And he'd increase cleanup funds 9.9% for the most polluted "Superfund" industrial sites and 30% for less-contaminated "brownfields." But critics are using Bush's cuts, and freezes in other programs, to charge that he's punishing regular Americans to help the wealthiest by making his tax cuts permanent. "This budget exposes priorities that are out of touch," says Gene Sperling, who was an economic adviser to President Clinton. "The fundamental political goal of this budget is to shift focus away from the true causes of the deficit explosion: excessive tax cuts." Bush sees things differently. "Our nation remains at war," he said in his budget message. "We will continue to provide whatever it takes to defend our country." Because of that imperative, Budget Director Josh Bolten says, "sacrifice across the board" is necessary in other parts of the budget. The budget, written with the election in mind, is an outline of how Bush believes government should be run:
Bush says his budget puts the government on a path to cut the deficit in half in five years, but even his supporters say that won't be easy. "He's going to have to make some very tough choices," says Alison Fraser, a budget analyst at the Heritage Foundation, a conservative think tank. Bush is betting that Americans share his view that the budget crunch is not entirely his fault. "The reason we are where we are is because we went through a recession, we were attacked and we're fighting a war. Those are high hurdles for a budget and for a country to overcome," he told his Cabinet on Monday. His comments suggested that he hopes voters also will give Congress responsibility -- or blame -- for spending cuts and deficits. "We're calling upon Congress to be wise with the taxpayers' money," he said. But the spending plan released Monday is Bush's alone. His imprint is literally underscored by his image: There are 28 photos of Bush in the 402-page main budget proposal. Last year, there were five. |



newsletter archive
